Continental Cross Contact LX25 Vs Michelin Cross Climate SUV

Continental Cross Contact LX25 vs Michelin Cross Climate SUV: If you’re an SUV enthusiast who relishes every ride as an expedition into uncharted territory or simply enjoys a comfortable drive that feels like gliding on clouds; pay close attention.

We’re about to delve deep into what makes these tires a true game-changer in their league. Buckle up as we take you on an adrenaline-pumping journey into the world of Continental’s CrossContact LX 25 (2019) versus CrossClimate SUV!

Results | Continental Cross Contact LX25 vs Michelin Cross Climate SUV

Tire Rack recently conducted comprehensive tests on three distinct tires, designed specifically for crossover SUVs. This testing process was intensive and robust, evaluating a multitude of aspects to ensure the provision of accurate results.

Among the tires tested were the Continental Cross Contact LX25 and the Michelin CrossClimate SUV. These particular models generated significant interest, with performance comparisons being drawn out in detail during the review. Throughout this process, Cross Contact LX25 served as our primary point of reference due to its popular usage and reputation in this vehicle category.

The testing protocol took into account various elements related to winter road conditions. Performance criteria included how well each tire could accelerate, brake, and handle under conditions comprising snow and ice along with a regular paved surface.

For uniformity within our testing environment, we focused solely on 235 60R18 size tires. This size is commonly found in widely used models such as Honda CR-V and Volvo XC60, hence enabling us to provide relevant comparisons that consumers will find particularly beneficial.

Wet Performance | Continental Crosscontact LX25 vs Michelin Crossclimate 2

In wet road conditions, the friction between the vehicle’s tires and the asphalt is significantly reduced. This notable decrease in friction can compromise the safety of motorists by increasing risks such as slipping or hydroplaning. Thus, the ability to maintain control and effective braking is critical during these hazardous situations.

In response to this concern, The European Union has taken proactive steps towards promoting safer driving in wet conditions. An EU regulation mandates that tire manufacturers should include information about wet braking performance on their product labels for better consumer awareness.

CrossClimate SUV tires have displayed superior performance in terms of wet braking compared to Cross Contact LX25. Impressively, they manage to stop 2.7 meters earlier than their competitor. This substantial difference substantially increases driving safety during rainy weather.

This performance enhancement isn’t merely restricted to braking – it also means improvements in handling time. Particularly in wet conditions, the more responsive Cross Climate SUV’s improved stopping power translates into a 0.05-second improvement in lap time.

Despite relatively small differences numerically, subjective evaluations favor the CrossClimate SUV over the CrossContact LX25 even more markedly. They’ve earned a higher rating based on drive feel and overall handling during wet conditions, further cementing their superiority when it comes to rainy-day performance.

Cross Climate SUV:

• +7.7% in wet braking
• +1.8% in wet handling (subj)
• +0.2% in wet handling (lap time)

Dry Performance | Crosscontact LX25 vs Crossclimate 2

The distance tends to be longer, but that does not typically present a safety concern. The reason behind this is that vehicles are designed with systems that can competently handle such situations. The extended braking distance under dry conditions doesn’t impede the car’s ability to come to a safe stop.

CrossClimate SUV tires indeed show consistent and impressive outcomes. In comparative tests, these tires have demonstrated their capacity to bring an automobile to a halt 2.2 meters earlier than the CrossContact LX25. Such a difference could potentially play a pivotal role in preventing road mishaps.

Considering the aspect of handling when driving on dry surfaces, both CrossClimate SUV and CrossContact LX25 tires stand on equal ground as they score high ratings consistently. They exhibit equally commendable efficiency in providing drivers with easy manoeuvrability and control regardless of weather or road conditions.

Cross Climate SUV:

• +9.5% in dry braking
• +0.5% in dry handling(subj)

Noise/Comfort/Ride Quality 

For premium SUVs among Michelin Crossclimate 2 vs Continental Crosscontact lx25, particular attention is given to two crucial aspects: noise and comfort for tires. These vital factors greatly influence the process of tire manufacturing as manufacturers aim to deliver an optimal riding experience.

Cross Contact LX25 and Cross Climate SUV are two competing tire models on the market. Though both have their respective strengths, Cross Contact LX25 outperforms in certain areas. Specifically, it shows a slight edge over its competition when it comes to noise comfort and ride quality.

In terms of reducing cabin noise, LX25 tires demonstrate higher proficiency compared to Cross Climate SUV tires. In the matter of providing a smooth, comfortable ride, the Cross Contact LX25 again holds a slightly higher score than the latter one. The moderate superiority makes it more appealing in the competitive tire market for premium SUVs.

Cross Climate SUV:

• -1% in average of Noise, Comfort & Ride Quality.

Snow Performance

One standout feature is that the Cross Climate SUV holds legal certification as a winter tire. This signifies that it has passed specific tests and meets rigorous standards for use during cold, snowy months. The CrossContact LX25 lacks this official winter certification. Despite this absence, surprising results emerged from snow tests; it turned out to excel under snowy conditions.

In three critical aspects – braking, acceleration, and handling in snowy circumstances – the Cross Contact LX25 demonstrated superiority over its competition. Counterintuitively, the performance of the winter-certified Cross Climate SUV on snow was observed to be below that of the uncertified Cross Contact LX25.

CrossClimate SUV:

• -4.1% in snow braking
• -2.3% in snow acceleration
• -2.3% in snow handling (subj)
• -1.7% in snow handling (lap time)

Ice Performance

During winter testing, the CrossContact LX25 showed a strong performance in snow conditions. Its ability to handle these tricky situations was particularly outstanding, making it the dominant player in such conditions. The CrossClimate SUV emerged as the preferred choice. It had a noticeable edge, primarily due to its superior control on such slippery surfaces.

There were also differences observed when comparing the braking efficiency of both vehicles. At speeds ranging from 40 km/h down to 0 km/h, the CrossClimate SUV showcased commendable efficiency by braking shorter than the CrossContact LX25. Specifically, it braked 0.3 meters shorter—an advantage that is critical for safety during high-speed driving or emergency stops.

CrossClimate SUV:

• +2.6% in ice braking

Price

Michelin, recognized globally as a leader in tire technology and innovation, has its products set at a premium price range. This is due to their reputation for outstanding performance and robust durability. As such, their tire prices are often higher compared to other brands in the market.

The Michelin CrossClimate SUV, being one of the top-tier models from Michelin’s product line, costs more than the competitor’s model – the Cross Contact LX25. Specifically speaking, it is 17% more expensive which substantiates Michelin’s position as an industry leader commanding higher prices.

Tire size: 255/55 R18
CrossClimate SUV: $240
Cross Contact LX25:  $205
Difference: +17% more expensive for CrossClimate SUV.

Conclusion

After the comparison between Continental Cross Contact LX25 vs Michelin Cross Climate SUV, we conclude that the CrossClimate SUV proves to be a superior choice in most performance criteria. Its impressive features and high-performance capabilities set it apart from other vehicles in its class.

Potential buyers should take into account its less-than-optimal snow performance. Despite this minor shortcoming, overall, it still emerges as the top performer among SUVs on the market. We encourage prospective buyers to test drive the CrossClimate SUV and experience first-hand its outstanding performance.

FAQs